![]() |
| Motor Car theft Insurance claims. |
The worst is your car is stolen and u also didn’t receive
the insurance money. I will try to explain here the few steps which every car owner should take immediately to have an insurance claim not being rejected.
The main document for car theft claims:
·
Most imp Car
keys original-
·
Original FIR Copy- Download from
police website.
·
Xerox of driving license
· Car insurance policy documents
· Xerox of RC book
·
Duly filled car theft claim form
·
RTO papers/forms like form 28, 29,
30 & 35.
Most Imp steps to claim car insurance in case of theft
are as
1-
Inform
the insurance company immediately the moment you come to know about your car
theft.
2-
Register
an FIR keep a copy of it and also inform the insurance about the F.I.R.
3-
Contact
the R.T.O and inform them about the theft of your car also apply for duplicate
if needed by insurance company for claim.
4-
submit
the following document
·
Car
R.C copy
·
duly
signed claim form
·
Policy
copy, insurance.
·
Driving
License
· F.I.R copy
· Intimation letter to R.T.O about the theft of your car.
·
R.T.O
Form 28,29,30,35
·
any
other document required by Insurance company
5-
After
the claim is settled you have to transfer your car RC to Insurance company and
handover the car key along with letter of subrogation. please ensure that the
police NTR is required beforehand for approval of the claim
Apply for N.T.R (No Trace Report): No-trace
report/untraced car report is given to you by the police, stating that your
insured car is untraceable. This report might take a month to be issued. It is
a vital document and the chances are high that your claim request would be
rejected if this report is found to be missing.
You would need to immediately obtain a duplicate RC book
from the road tax officer’s office. and also License in case you lost it with
your Vehicle. Ensure that u have all the keys.
The
insurance claim approval also depends upon surveyor’s report as to how the car
was parked, weather the door was locked window was opened.
Case Laws
Industrial Promotion & Investment
Corpn. of Orissa Ltd. v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. (2016) 15 SCC 315, United
India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Orient Treasures (P) Ltd. (2016) 3 SCC 49, General
Assurance Society Ltd. v. Chandumull Jain (1966) 3 SCR 500, which
explained the principle.
Where there is ambiguity in the policy the court will apply the contra proferentem rule. It means that ambiguity in the wording of the policy is to be resolved against the party who prepared the contract.The Court quoted from General Assurance Society Ltd. v. Chandumull Jain (1966) 3 SCR 500 as follows :
""in a contract of
insurance there is requirement of uberrima fides i.e. good faith on the part of
the assured and the contract is likely to be construed contra proferentem, that
is, against the company in case of ambiguity or doubt"".
Sushilaben Indravadan
Gandhi and another Vs The New India Assurance Co &ors
The S.C Held as Exemption
clause in Insurance contracts is to be construed against insurer in case of
doubt.
S.C retreated the Principle for grant of compensation Motor
Accident Cases.
Guidelines to Ensure
Victims Money Is Not Frittered Away: In this case, the High Court while
enhancing the amount of compensation had directed that the enhanced amount be
paid to the appellant within 45 days. The Court said that the following
guidelines issued in General Manager, Kerala State Road Transport
Corporation, Trivandrum v. Susamma Thomas 1994 SCC (2) 176 should be followed
by all the tribunals and High Courts to ensure that the money of the victims is
not frittered away.
The
Apex court in Om prakash v/s. Reliance general Insurance ,2017
“If the reason for the delay in making a claim is satisfactorily explained, such a claim cannot be rejected on the ground of delay. It is also necessary to state here that it would not be fair and reasonable to reject genuine claims which had already been verified and found to be correct by the investigator.
The Court also reiterated that the Consumer Protection Act aims at providing better
protection of the interest of consumers and it is a beneficial legislation that
deserves liberal construction. This laudable object
should not be forgotten while considering the claims made under the Act,”
Bishwa Kumar Jain # 9582584584 B com (h). L.L.B. DIP Cyber Law. Member International Arbitration U.K. Practice Advocate Supreme Court and High Court of Delhi.



Comments
Post a Comment
Thank you, for your valuable comment.