Skip to main content

Divorce Made Easy - The Quickest and Easiest Way- Mutual Consent personal law - 2 hearings.


Divorce was never so easy. whenever we think of divorce the first thing which comes in our mind is long prolonged court room drama. The court with the introduction of divorce by mutual consent is so easy, no one can think of. 
The other benefit of divorce by mutual consent besides quick and easy is, that the blame game and court room drama is avoided and the relation is not deteriorated as its an amicable solution reached by both the party and one has not to describe and take there personal differences and issues in court.
First petition,
6 months cool off period to reconcile
Second motion.
Different laws on divorce for different religion in India.
Divorce is covered by personal Law.
Christians are governed by Indian Divorce Act-1869 & The Indian Christian Marriage Act,1872.
Hindus (which includes Sikh, Jain, Budhhist) are governed by Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
Special Marriage Act,1954. is a secular law which covers marriage registered under special marriage act.
Mutual Consent Divorce in case of Christian Couple
Mutual Consent Divorce in case of Christian Couple is governed by The Divorce Act, 1869, under Section 10 A.
A petition for dissolution of marriage may be presented to the District Court by both the parties to a marriage together, on the ground that they have been living separately for a period of two years or more, that they have not been able to live together and they have mutually agreed that the marriage should be dissolved.
Secondly on the motion of both the parties made no earlier than six months after the date of presentation of the petition referred to in sub-section (1) and not later than 18 months after the said date, if the petition is not withdrawn by both the parties in the meantime, the Court shall, on being satisfied hearing the parties and after making such inquiry as it thinks fit, that a marriage has been solemnized and that the avertments made in the petition are true, pass a decree of divorce declaring the marriage to be dissolved with effect from the date of decree.
The period of 6 to 18 months provided in section 13(B). is a period of interregnum which is intended to give time and opportunity to the parties to reflect on their move. In this transitional period the parties or either of them may have second thoughts.
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
Section 13(B) in the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
13(B) Divorce by mutual consent.
(1) Subject to the provisions of this Act a petition for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce may be presented to the district court by both the parties to a marriage together, whether such marriage was solemnized before or after the commencement of the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976 (68 of 1976)*, on the ground that they have been living separately for a period of one year or more, that they have not been able to live together and that they have mutually agreed that the marriage should be dissolved.
 2) On the motion of both the parties made not earlier than six months after the date of the presentation of the petition referred to in sub-section (1) and not later than eighteen months after the said date, if the petition is not withdrawn in the meantime, the court shall, on being satisfied, after hearing the parties and after making such inquiry as it thinks fit, that a marriage has been solemnized and that the averments in the petition are true, pass a decree of divorce declaring the marriage to be dissolved with effect from the date of the decree.
      i) The period of 6 to 18 months provided in section 13(B) is a period of interregnum which is intended to give time and opportunity to the parties to reflect on their move. In this transitional period the parties or either of them may have second thoughts.
 Suman v. Surendra Kumar, AIR 2003 Raj 155.
    ii) The period of living separately for one year must be immediately preceding the presentation of petition. The expression living separately' connotes not living like husband and wife. It has no reference to the place of living. The parties may live under the same roof and yet they may not be living as husband and wife. The parties should have no desire to perform marital obligations;
 Sureshta Devi v. Om Prakash, AIR 1992 SC 1904.
    iii) The period of six to eighteen months time is given in divorce by mutual consent as to give time and opportunity to the parties to reflect on their move and seek advice from relations and friends. Mutual consent should continue till the divorce decree is passed. The court should be satisfied about the bona fide and consent of the parties. If there is no consent at the time of inquiry the court gets no jurisdiction to make a decree for divorce. If the court is held to have the power to make a decree solely based on the initial petition, it negates the whole idea of mutuality. There can be unilateral withdrawal of consent. Held, that since consent of the wife was obtained by fraud and wife was not willing to consent, there could be unilateral withdrawal, of consent;
 Sureshta Devi v. Om Prakash, AIR 1992 SC 1904.
Jurisdiction of the court ?
The Married couple last resided. The Family Court has the jurisdiction.
How to file mutual consent divorce petition?
The divorce petition is in the form of affidavit, which is to be submitted to the family court. After the filing of the petition and recording the statement of both the parties, the court generally adjourns the matter for a period of 6 months.
Conditions and Requirements.
The marriage is legitimate only under the following conditions:
They should be legally married. That the marriage is legal
The agreement between the two parties must be free and voluntary and without compulsion, undue influence, or threat of violence. the document is prepared called memorandum of understanding or is a simple document which states the condition of divorce between the parties as to child custody. Maintenance money .Distribution of Assets. Child visitation right and any other legal matter which the party things fit.
Mutual Consent Divorce in case of Court Marriage
Mutual Consent Divorce in case of Court marriage is governed by The Special Marriage Act, 1954 under Section 28.
A petition for divorce may be presented to the District Court by both the parties together on the ground that they have been living separately for a period of one year or more, that they have not been able to live together and that they have mutually agreed that the marriage should be dissolved.
Secondly on the motion of both the parties made no earlier than six months after the date of the presentation of the petition referred to it in sub-section (1) and not later than 18 months after the said date, if the petition is not withdrawn in the meantime, the District Court shall, on being satisfied, after hearing the parties and after making such inquiry as it thinks fit, that a marriage has been solemnized under this Act, and that the averments in the petition are true, pass a decree declaring the marriage to be dissolved with effect from the date of the decree.
The main requirements for Mutual Consent Divorce under section 13(B) as follows:
The couple has been living separately for a period of one year (two year christian) or more
The couple has not been able to live together and
The couple mutually agreed that the marriage be dissolved.
The procedure goes same first petition is filed and then after 6 months the second petition is filed.
The process is very simple the M.O.U. (agreement) is prepared and is signed and attested and with other document is filed in the court the court gives a date to appear.
on the given date the couple appeared before the family court and and the magistrate after making sure the due process gives the next date to appear which is after six months after the expiration of six months and before 18 months the couple again appear in the court with all the original Ids and divorce order is typed and that’s it it’s a divorce.

Bishwa Kumar Jain # 9582584584 B com (h). L.L.B. DIP Cyber Law. Member International Arbitration U.K. Practice Advocate Supreme Court and High Court of Delhi.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to claim Insurance-Motor Car theft Insurance claims.

Motor Car theft Insurance claims. Nothing is more upsetting than getting to know your car is stolen and what is left with you is only your car Key We become upset when our car is stolen. The first thing which struck us is Insurance. The worst is your car is stolen and u also didn’t receive the insurance money. I will try to explain here the few steps which every car owner should take immediately to have an insurance claim not being rejected. The main document for car theft claims:   ·                      Most imp Car keys original- ·                      Original FIR Copy- Download from police website. ·                      Xerox of driving license ·    ...

RBI, The history of Reserve Bank of India. A brief analysis of its history from nothing to everything.

Reserve Bank of India- The Birth Of Paper Currency   The Reserve Bank of India was established under Act 2 of 1934 for the purpose of    (i) regulating the issue of bank notes,  (ii) keeping of reserves with a view to securing monetary stability in the  country and  (iii) operating the currency and credit system of the country to its advantage.  The role of a central bank such as the Reserve Bank in an economy is to manage  (i) the currency  (ii) the money supply and  (iii) interest rates.  The unique feature of a central bank is the monopoly that it has on increasing the monetary base in the state and the control it has in the printing of the national currency. The central bank virtually functions as “a lender of last resort” to banks suffering a liquidity crisis. Historians trace the rise of modern central banks to the establishment of the Bank of England under a Royal Charter granted on 27-07-1694 through the Tunnage Act, 169...

Article 19. Sec 144 Cr.PC - RTI-Freedom of Expression on Internet

                                                       Internet and Freedom of expression                                                                                                                                     https://www.facebook.com/bishwa.jain.9 Is government empowered enough to curb voice of its citizen at the awake of Sec144  Cr.PC over internet and social media.  A brief explanation of freedom of speech and expression and sec 144 Cr.PC (curfew)   ANURADHA BHASIN...