EXPLAINING LAW

                                             https://www.facebook.com/bishwa.jain.9                       " ADULTERY NO CRIME BUT A CIVIL WRONG".    Joseph Shine v.s U.O.I   .... Supreme court in its landmark judgment held Sec 487, Adultery Law is unconstitutional and is violative of Article-14,15,21 Constitution of India.    It is declared that : (i) Section 497 is struck down as unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution. (ii)   Section 198(2) of the Cr.P.C. which contains the procedure for prosecution under Chapter XX of the I.P.C. shall be unconstitutional only to the extent that it is applicable to the offence of Adultery under Section 497. While arriving at the Judgment the age old law was declared void an...

                                                       Internet and Freedom of expression                                                                                                                                     https://www.facebook.com/bishwa.jain.9 Is government empowered enough to curb voice of its citizen at the awake of Sec144  Cr.PC over internet and social media.  A brief explanation of freedom of speech and expression and sec 144 Cr.PC (curfew)   ANURADHA BHASIN...

When a crime is committed a person is sent to prison by state as those crimes are committed against society and state. The state prosecute the criminal and sentenced him to undergo imprison. the state protect an individual freedom and also its subject, as we cannot defend ourselves with such criminal. https://www.facebook.com/bishwa.jain.9                                    But when a crime is committed against a person and all people stand by to watch it and making video is a shame to humanity. We human consider our self as the most intelligent species on planet Earth and when we see such crime our faith in humanity is shattered to pieces. The spectrum of human cruelty seemingly has elastic bounds based on the escalating frequency of mass violence. Most explanations of motive are effective at identifying emerging symptoms that predict murderous behavior, but few exp...

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Monday, April 13, 2020. ‘Judicial Magistrate can Order Accused to Give Voice Sample’ Supreme Court'                                        'Bombay High Court ordered to destroy voice sample' Legal Confusion? The Supreme Court of India in an historic Judgment has allowed the court to compel a person to give his voice sample to investigating agency during investigation. The Bombay High Court on the contrary ordered to destroy voice sample. So which is a settled law? A plain reading will say Bombay High Court erred in the judgment and overlooked The Supreme Court Judgment. October 2019 judgment in Vinit Kumar v. Central Bureau of Investigations and Ors , wherein the Bombay High Court outlined the ambit of the State’s power to surveillance its subjects particularly on matters that do not fall under the  of ‘public emergency /in the interes...